Leader of the Opposition, Kemi Badenoch, has sharply criticised Prime Minister Keir Starmer’s decision to cancel a planned increase in defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP by 2030, calling it “indefensible” amid escalating global security threats.
In a letter dated February 22, 2025, Badenoch accused Starmer of failing to act decisively on national security, warning that delays could have serious consequences. She highlighted growing threats from Russia and the pressure on NATO allies to contribute more, particularly following statements from former U.S. President Donald Trump.
Security Risks and Policy Contradictions
Badenoch questioned the rationale behind the spending cut, stating: “Why did you think, as it became apparent that Russia was trying to strengthen its hand in the conflict, that canceling planned increases in defense expenditure up to 2030 was right?”
She also pointed out an apparent contradiction in Starmer’s approach, criticizing his decision to propose British troop deployments in Ukraine while refusing to boost military spending.
“At the same time as offering a major new deployment of British military forces on the frontline with Russia, you refused to accept the case for increasing defense expenditure now,” she wrote.
Call for Budget Reallocation
Badenoch urged the government to restore the planned defense spending increase before Starmer’s upcoming meeting with Donald Trump, insisting that further investments were necessary.
She suggested reallocating funds from Overseas Development to defense, arguing that “every pound of taxpayers’ money spent overseas must be directly furthering our safety and stability.”
She also criticized the government’s welfare policies, arguing that savings from welfare reforms should be directed towards national security instead of further social spending.
Chagos Islands Dispute
Badenoch further condemned the government’s handling of the Chagos Islands, calling it an “indefensible surrender of British territory.” She warned against a rushed deal with Mauritius that could see Britain cede control of the islands while paying billions in compensation.
“You should not be concluding a deal that would mean British taxpayers paying Mauritius billions of pounds to take our territory,” she wrote, demanding transparency on whether defense funds were involved in the negotiations.
Warning Against Inaction
Badenoch concluded with a warning about the consequences of inaction, stating: “I will always back you when you do the right thing. But I will not be silent about the risks facing our country and our security. History has been unforgiving to politicians who, faced with growing threats, chose procrastination over action.”
